West Ham 1-1 Manchester City Stats: Hammers Snatch Dramatic Late Draw

West Ham snatched a stoppage-time equaliser to deny Manchester City victory in a tense WSL encounter. Explore the key facts and stats in our comprehensive post-match breakdown.

Match Overview

Final Score: West Ham United 1-1 Manchester City
Date: March 5, 2025
Competition: WSL Round 16
Venue: Chigwell Construction Stadium, Dagenham, Essex

West Ham United secured a dramatic late draw against title-chasing Manchester City in a hard-fought WSL encounter. After falling behind to Khadija Shaw's 80th minute strike, the Hammers showed remarkable resilience to equalise through substitute Manuela Pavi in the first minute of stoppage time, ending City's five-match winning streak in all competitions.

Phases of Play Analysis

First Half (0-0)

The opening period was characterised by tactical caution from both sides, with Manchester City dominating possession (64% vs 36%) but unable to convert that control into clear-cut opportunities. West Ham's compact defensive shape restricted City to mainly half-chances, while the Hammers showed threat on counter-attacks and set-pieces.

First Half Stats Breakdown:

• West Ham: 3 shots on target from 6 attempts (50% accuracy)

• Manchester City: 2 shots on target from 6 attempts (33% accuracy)

• West Ham passes: 139 (68% accuracy)

• Manchester City passes: 280 (86% accuracy)

• West Ham created more danger with 6 corners to City's 2

Second Half (1-1)

The match opened up significantly after the break with both teams showing greater attacking intent. Manchester City increased pressure in the final third, creating 11 shots with 6 on target compared to West Ham's 4 shots (2 on target). The visitor's persistence paid off when Shaw broke the deadlock in the 80th minute, but West Ham's resilience was rewarded with Pavi's equaliser in stoppage time.

Second Half Stats Breakdown:

• West Ham: 2 shots on target from 4 attempts (50% accuracy)

• Manchester City: 6 shots on target from 11 attempts (55% accuracy)

• West Ham passes: 134 (69% accuracy)

• Manchester City passes: 262 (88% accuracy)

• Manchester City created 2 big chances with 66% possession

Tactical Analysis

West Ham's Approach

West Ham deployed a defensive 3-4-2-1 formation focused on solidity and transition opportunities. Their tactical approach included:

1. Compact low block: Maintaining disciplined defensive shape with 27 clearances

2. Rapid counter-attacks: Despite only 35% possession, they registered 5 shots on target

3. Set-piece threat: Utilizing 9 corners to create danger

4. Key half-time adjustment: Introducing Manuela Pavi for Shekiera Martinez, providing fresh attacking impetus

5. Direct play: Using long balls (42% accuracy) to bypass City's press

Manchester City's Approach

Manchester City employed their traditional possession-based 4-1-4-1 formation with Yui Hasegawa anchoring midfield. Their tactical plan consisted of:

1. Controlled build-up: 87% pass accuracy with 542 total passes

2. Wide overloads: Using full-backs to create crossing opportunities (20% accuracy)

3. Midfield dominance: 17 interceptions disrupting West Ham's attacking transitions

4. High press: Pushing defensive line upfield, resulting in 26 touches in opposition box

5. Pattern play: Using interchange between attacking midfielders to create space

Individual Performances

Key Performers - West Ham United

Manuela Pavi (7.5 rating)

• 1 goal

• 1 chance created

• 2/2 successful dribbles (100%)

• 11/14 passes completed (79%)

• Decisive impact as a substitute

Katrina Gorry (7.5 rating)

• 2/3 tackles won (67%)

• 2 interceptions

• 17/25 passes completed (68%)

• 2 successful dribbles (67%)

• 8 recoveries

Riko Ueki (7.5 rating)

• 1 assist

• 1 chance created

• 2/2 shots on target (100%)

• 23/33 passes completed (70%)

• 5 recoveries

Anouk Denton (7.5 rating)

• 6/6 tackles won (100%, match-high)

• 2 interceptions

• 7/9 ground duels won (78%)

• 5 passes into final third

• 1/2 shots on target (50%)

Key Performers - Manchester City

Jessica Park (7.9 rating) - Player of the Match

• 8 duels won (match-high)

• 3/4 tackles won (75%)

• 3 interceptions

• 35/45 passes completed (78%)

• 7 passes into final third

Jill Roord (7.9 rating)

• 3 chances created (match-high)

• 2/2 shots on target (100%)

• 25/30 passes completed (83%)

• 3 passes into final third

• 2/4 tackles won (50%)

Laura Wienroither (7.7 rating)

• Hit woodwork once

• 3/4 tackles won (75%)

• 3 interceptions

• 43/54 passes completed (80%)

• 7 passes into final third

Khadija Shaw (7.3 rating)

• 1 goal

• 2/4 shots on target (50%)

• 4/5 passes completed (80%)

• 2/3 ground duels won (67%)

• Impactful as a substitute

Momentum Analysis

1. Minutes 7-10: Strong City momentum (+60%) with early pressure

2. Minutes 39-41: West Ham surge (+100%) creating multiple first-half chances

3. Minutes 62-69: Prolonged City momentum (+100%) building toward Shaw's goal

4. Minutes 73-82: Decisive City period (-98%) culminating in Shaw's goal

5. Minutes 86-90: West Ham's late resurgence (+19%) leading to Pavi's equaliser

Substitution Impact

West Ham's substitutions:

• Shekiera Martinez → Manuela Pavi (46'): Rating difference +1.32, decisive impact with equalizing goal

• Shelina Zadorsky → Princess Ademiluyi (57'): Rating difference -0.64, struggled to make impact

• Eva Nyström → Camila Saez (73'): Rating difference -1.05, defensive reinforcement

• Katrina Gorry → Dagny Brynjarsdottir (79'): Rating difference -1.38, fresh legs in midfield

Manchester City's substitutions:

• Leila Ouahabi → Kerstin Casparij (46'): Rating difference +0.08, improved defensive solidity

• Lily Murphy → Khadija Shaw (67'): Rating difference +1.1, game-changing impact with goal

• Laura Coombs → Karolin (72'): Rating difference -0.61, struggled to maintain midfield control

• Jill Roord → Vivianne Miedema (77'): Rating difference -0.96, crucial assist despite limited time

Set Piece Analysis

Set pieces played a significant role in West Ham's attacking threat:

• Corners: West Ham 9, Manchester City 4

• Accurate crosses: West Ham 4/20 (20%), Manchester City 4/20 (20%)

• West Ham created multiple dangerous moments from corners, particularly in the first half

Key Match Insights

1. Possession vs Efficiency: Despite City's 65% possession, West Ham's disciplined defensive structure limited quality chances

2. Tactical Discipline: West Ham won 90% of tackles compared to City's 74%, showing their defensive organisation

3. Bench Impact: Both teams' substitutes made decisive contributions, with Shaw scoring and Pavi equalising

4. Technical Quality Gap: City's pass accuracy (87% vs 68%) highlighted their technical advantage

5. Momentum Management: West Ham's resilience in weathering prolonged City pressure before finding late equaliser

Conclusion

The 1-1 draw between West Ham United and Manchester City showcased both tactical discipline and individual quality. Despite Manchester City's dominance in possession and technical superiority, West Ham's resilient defensive performance and clinical finishing from substitute Manuela Pavi earned them a valuable point.

The match demonstrated several key factors that influenced the outcome:

1. The effectiveness of West Ham's compact defensive structure against City's possession-based approach

2. The impact of well-timed substitutions from both managers

3. City's inability to kill the game despite creating more high-quality chances

4. West Ham's persistence and mental strength to find a late equalizer

5. Individual quality making the difference at crucial moments

This result maintains Manchester City's position in 4th place in the WSL table but represents a concerning setback in their top-three ambitions, now leaving them 1 point behind Arsenal with a game in hand. Meanwhile, West Ham will take significant confidence from their resilient performance against one of the league's strongest sides.